Views provided by UsageCounts
Monocytes comprise several subsets with distinct phenotypes and functional capacities. Based on CD163 expression, two major monocyte subsets can be discriminated in the porcine bone marrow. The CD163+ cells expressed higher levels of SLA-DR, Siglec-1, CD11R1 and CD16 when compared to CD163- monocytes, whereas no remarkable differences were observed in the expression of other markers analyzed. Gene expression analysis showed differential expression of several chemokine receptor and TLR genes. Both subsets phagocytosed microspheres with similar efficiency. However, CD163- cells tended to produce higher levels of ROS in response to PMA, whereas CD163+ cells were more efficient in endocytosing and processing antigens (DQ-OVA). CD163- monocytes produced higher levels of TNF-α and IL-10 than CD163+ cells when stimulated with LPS or Imiquimod. Both subsets produced similar amounts of IL-8 in response to LPS; however, CD163+ cells produced more IL-8 after Imiquimod stimulation. Whether these subsets represent different developmental stages, and how are they related remain to be investigated.
Lipopolysaccharides, Swine, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Bone Marrow Cells, Receptors, Cell Surface, Monocytes, Antigens, CD, Histocompatibility Antigens, Animals, Bone marrow, Cells, Cultured, Antigen Presentation, Imiquimod, Interleukin-8, Toll-Like Receptors, Endocytosis, Interleukin-10, Oxidative Stress, Phenotype, Aminoquinolines, CD163, Receptors, Chemokine
Lipopolysaccharides, Swine, Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic, Bone Marrow Cells, Receptors, Cell Surface, Monocytes, Antigens, CD, Histocompatibility Antigens, Animals, Bone marrow, Cells, Cultured, Antigen Presentation, Imiquimod, Interleukin-8, Toll-Like Receptors, Endocytosis, Interleukin-10, Oxidative Stress, Phenotype, Aminoquinolines, CD163, Receptors, Chemokine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 45 |

Views provided by UsageCounts