Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DIGITAL.CSIC
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Relative growth and comparative morphometrics of Mugil cephalus L. and M. curema V. in the Gulf of Mexico

Authors: Ibáñez Aguirre, Ana Laura; Lleonart, Jordi;

Relative growth and comparative morphometrics of Mugil cephalus L. and M. curema V. in the Gulf of Mexico

Abstract

[EN] The morphometric differences between two congeneric species, Mugil cephalus and M. curema, and their sexes are studied through ten measurements. The allometries of each measurement are estimated in relation to total length. Morphometric variations are analysed using three transformations: (i) logarithmic transformation, (ii) division of each variable by total length, and (iii) normalization of the individuals of each group; and three multivariate methods: (a) reciprocal averaging, (b) principal component analysis and (c) canonical analysis of populations. Results indicate that the morphology of both species is different, male and female M. cephalus were clearly discriminated into two groups, while no important differences were found between the sexes of M. curema. The separation of the groups, due to differences in “shape” rather than “size” was observed through analysis of reciprocal averaging and canonical analysis of populations by normalization of the individuals in each group. The morphometric variables that differentiated the four groups were thickness at maximum width, length to anal fin and cephalic length.

[ES] Se estudian las diferencias morfométricas entre dos especies congenéricas. Mugil cephalus Mugil curema, y sus sexos empleando diez medidas somaticas. Las alometrías de cada medida se estiman en relación a la longitud total. Se analizan las variaciones morformétricas mediante tres transformaciones: (i) transformación logarítmica, (ii) división de cada variable por la longitud total y (iii) normalización de los individuos de cada grupo; y tres análisis multivariantes: (a) análisis de correspondencias, (b) análisis de componentes principales y (e) análisis canónico de poblaciones. Los resultados indican diferencias en la morfología de ambas especies

8 páginas, 5 figuras, 5 tablas

Peer reviewed

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
Keywords

Mugil curema, Gulf of Mexico, Mugil cephalus, Relative growth, Morfometría, Golfo de México, Morphometrics, Crecimiento relativo

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 81
    download downloads 115
  • 81
    views
    115
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
81
115