Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Stakeholder perceptions of European rabbit damage to agriculture

Authors: Morales-Reyes, Zebensui; Arroyo, Beatriz; Garrido, Fernando; Delibes-Mateos, Miguel; Villafuerte, Rafael;

Stakeholder perceptions of European rabbit damage to agriculture

Abstract

Human' wildlife interactions can be negative when wildlife impact human livelihoods. In the Iberian Mediterranean Basin, the management of the native European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) constitutes a classic example of human-wildlife conflict. Rabbits can be dually perceived as beneficial or harmful, since they may cause significant damage to agriculture, but at the same time they are one of the most important small-game species and act as an ecological keystone species (e.g. as prey for many predator species of conservation concern). Under this scenario, conservationists, hunters and farmers frequently have different positions in relation to rabbit management, hence conflicts between these groups are common. Here, we examined stakeholder perceptions of the rabbit and its management in Spain. To do this, we conducted face-to-face questionnaires to 820 hunters, farmers and farmers-hunters (i.e. farmers who practised hunting) in two predominantly agricultural areas where there is significant rabbit damage to vineyards. The majority of surveyed people (c. 75%) considered that conflicts were much more intense a few years ago, when the abundance of the rabbit population was significantly higher. However, despite this general agreement, hunters and farmers had some disagreements on the assessment of the problem, the influencing factors, and possible solutions. Farmer-hunters were often in an intermediate position between hunters and farmers, making them a group of particular interest as potential mediators of conflicts over rabbit management. Perceptions of rabbit population abundance had an important influence on the preferred management measures by stakeholders, with individuals indicating higher perceived abundance supporting harder management measures. Our findings emphasize the importance of promoting initiatives aimed at increasing the coordination and collaboration between hunters and farmers for improving human-wildlife conflict management strategies.

Resumen del trabajo presentado a la Pathways Europe 2022: Human Dimensions of Wildlife Conference, celebrada en Paises Bajos del 19 al 21 de octubre.

Peer reviewed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 58
    download downloads 100
  • 58
    views
    100
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
58
100
Green