AbstractOne common strategy in the search for new zeolites is the use of organic structure‐directing agents (OSDA). Typically, one seeks to achieve a high specificity in the structure‐directing effect of the OSDA. This study shows, however, that an OSDA lacking strong specificity towards any particular zeolite may provide opportunities for discovery when other synthesis parameters are systematically screened. Thus, 1‐methyl‐2‐ethyl‐3‐n‐propylimidazolium has allowed to crystallize the new large/medium pore zeolite HPM‐16 as well as the recently reported extra‐large pore ‐SYT and the medium/small pore and chiral STW. The sophisticated OSDA originally affording ‐SYT and the new simple OSDA have very little in common, both in terms of size, shape and flexibility, while both may still direct the synthesis of the same zeolite. In fact, molecular simulations show that the new OSDA is located in three different positions of the ‐SYT structure, including the discrete 8MR where the original organic could not fit.