Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DIGITAL.CSIC
Conference object . 2022
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
addClaim

BLUE for the scatterometer constellation

Authors: Stoffelen, Ad; Belmonte Rivas, María; Trindade, Ana; Portabella, Marcos; de Chiara, Giovanna;

BLUE for the scatterometer constellation

Abstract

High-resolution satellite-derived sea-surface wind data, such as those from scatterometers, are increasingly available for operational monitoring and forecasting of the ocean. In this presentation we present the scatterometer constellation and show first results that indicate that the scatterometer wind data assimilation process can be potentially much improved by bias correction. Belmonte & Stoffelen (2019) documented large NWP model errors on both large and small scales and on all temporal scales. Trindade et al. (2019) succeeded to compute stable gridded NWP minus scatterometer differences over a few days, which were subsequently used to correct a time series of numerical weather prediction (NWP) outputs in a product that they called ERA*. They verified ERA* against independent wind measurements, which resulted in a reduction of the observation minus NWP field, so-called o-b, global variance of 20%. An o-b reduction of 20% is very substantial. Moreover, the reduction is due to bias correction, which helps to more closely fulfill the BLUE paradigm of NWP data assimilation. BLUE stands for Best Linear Unbiased Estimate and is necessary to well inform the atmospheric state variables of the NWP model. Data assimilation of scatterometer data in NWP generally only resolves NWP spatial scales of ~150 km. Therefore, information on the wind-SST interaction, the diurnal wind cycle and the wind variability in moist convection areas is lost in such products. Moreover, known systematic NWP model (parameterization) errors and ocean currents contribute to local biases, which are rather time invariant. Such biases prevent to properly correct the meso- and large-scale NWP dynamical errors. Following ERA*, a bias correction scheme may be implemented that takes out the slow biases in o-b mentioned above, that are mostly related to the local ocean state and not resolved in NWP models. The corrections can be further used to attribute errors to the bias (and variability) source terms in order to improve the air-sea interaction modelling, which will be important in the coupling of atmosphere and ocean models of the future

15th International Winds Workshop, 12-16 April 2021.-- 30 pages

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average