Downloads provided by UsageCounts
AbstractThe enantiomeric purity of (+/–)‐methyl jasmonate in fresh leaf material of Jasminum from different species and Rosmarinus officinalis was examined by solid‐phase microextraction‐GC‐MS (SPME‐GC‐MS). For comparison with these natural products, commercial jasmine and rosemary fragrances were also studied. The extraction conditions were selected as a result of testing different values of temperature (40, 50, and 60°C) and time (2, 15, 30, and 40 min). The results obtained in this work revealed a range of enantiomeric excesses for (+/–)‐methyl jasmonate varying from 13 to 95% depending on the Jasminum specie considered. In contrast, (–)‐methyl jasmonate always occurred as a pure enantiomer in all R. officinalis samples studied. This implies those Jasminum species in which the enantiomeric purity of (–)‐methyl jasmonate is high enough and any R. officinalis sample might be used as natural sources of pure (–)‐methyl jasmonate. Concerning the commercial fragrances, those of jasmine showed enantiomeric composition of (–)‐methyl jasmonate ranging from 1 to 15% whereas those of rosemary exhibited practically the pure (–)‐methyl jasmonate. This fact suggests the addition and nonaddition of the racemic mixture of methyl jasmonate to the commercial jasmine and rosemary samples, respectively.
Plant Leaves, Molecular Structure, Plant Growth Regulators, Stereoisomerism, Cyclopentanes, Oxylipins, Acetates, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Perfume
Plant Leaves, Molecular Structure, Plant Growth Regulators, Stereoisomerism, Cyclopentanes, Oxylipins, Acetates, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Perfume
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 44 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts