
handle: 10261/240250
[EN]In a recent paper, the authors have proposed an axiomatic system for a modal logic of gradual preference on fuzzy propositions that was claimed to be complete with respect to the intended semantics. Unfortunately, the completeness proof has a flaw, that leaves still open the question of whether the proposed system is actually complete. In this paper, we propose an alternative axiomatic system with a multi-modal language, where the original modal operators are definable and their semantics are preserved, and for which completeness results are proved.
Vidal is supported by the project no. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/17 050/0008361, “Enhancing human resources for research in theoretical computer science”, funded by the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic. Esteva and Godo acknowledge partial support by the FEDER/MINECO project TIN2015-71799-C2-1-P.
Peer reviewed
Completeness, fuzzy preferences, Fuzzy preferences, Fuzzy modal logic, fuzzy modal logic
Completeness, fuzzy preferences, Fuzzy preferences, Fuzzy modal logic, fuzzy modal logic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
