Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.3390/app10010150
handle: 10261/234924
The concept of equifinality is currently one of the largest issues in taphonomy, frequently leading analysts to erroneously interpret the formation and functionality of archaeological and paleontological sites. An example of this equifinality can be found in the differentiation between anthropic cut marks and other traces on bone produced by natural agents, such as that of sedimentary abrasion and trampling. These issues are a key component in the understanding of early human evolution, yet frequently rely on qualitative features for their identification. Unfortunately, qualitative data is commonly susceptible to subjectivity, producing insecurity in research through analyst experience. The present study intends to confront these issues through a hybrid methodological approach. Here, we combine Geometric Morphometric data, 3D digital microscopy, and Deep Learning Neural Networks to provide a means of empirically classifying taphonomic traces on bone. Results obtained are able to reach over 95% classification, providing a possible means of overcoming taphonomic equifinality in the archaeological and paleontological register.
Technology, Microscopy, equifinality, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, taphonomy, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Equifinality, Chemistry, Taphonomy, microscopy, TA1-2040, Biology (General), Archaeological data science, archaeological data science, QD1-999
Technology, Microscopy, equifinality, QH301-705.5, T, Physics, QC1-999, taphonomy, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Equifinality, Chemistry, Taphonomy, microscopy, TA1-2040, Biology (General), Archaeological data science, archaeological data science, QD1-999
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 45 | |
| downloads | 88 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts