Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/222691
Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) can be viable options for biological control of agricultural pests. The selection of fungal strains is crucial for a successful pest control. The current study aimed to determine in the laboratory the susceptibility of different immature stages of Duponchelia fovealis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) to EPF strains (Beauveria bassiana Bea111 and Cordyceps javanica Isa340). Immature stages of D. fovealis were sprayed with EPF concentrations from 2 × 103 to 2 × 109 conidia mL−1 and their viability and mortality were evaluated. Lethal time and concentration were estimated for pupae and each larval instar. Virulence depended on strain, dose, and insect life stage. The eggs were resistant to Bea111 and Isa340 strains. Mortality of larvae depended on the EPF strain and the larval instar, with the first instar being the most sensitive. Lethal concentrations for D. fovealis 1st instar larvae were 3.4 × 105 and 1.7 × 107 conidia mL−1 with Bea111 and Isa340, respectively. Isa340 performed better than Bea111 for controlling pupae. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the adhesion and penetration structures of both fungi in the 2nd instar infected larvae 6 h after inoculation, while fungal extrusion occurred between 54 and 94 h after spraying with Bea111 and Isa340, respectively.
This work was supported by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [grant numbers 1726812 and 1771724], and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [grant number 403266/2013–0].
31 Pags.- 2 Tabl.- 6 Figs. The definitive version is available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02612194
Peer reviewed
Entomopathogenic fungi, Virulence, Biocontrol agents, Electron microscopy, European pepper moth, Fragaria x ananassa
Entomopathogenic fungi, Virulence, Biocontrol agents, Electron microscopy, European pepper moth, Fragaria x ananassa
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 83 | |
| downloads | 200 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts