Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5209/rpub.62968
handle: 10261/220493
El uso y abuso por parte de la teoría populista (Laclau, Mouffe, Errejón) de la filosofía de Antonio Gramsci ha supuesto una erosión, deformación y falsificación de buena parte de sus conceptos, sometidos a un juego de espejos posmoderno. En este artículo quisiéramos mostrar cómo la interpretación populista de dos categorías centrales del pensamiento gramsciano, “hegemonía” y “nacional-popular”, es un buen ejemplo de ello. Los principales hilos conductores que seguiremos serán la desconexión con su matriz leninista, el vaciado político de sus ideas y un reduccionismo idealista.
Populism, Hegemonía, Gramsci, National-popular, marxismo, Hegemony, Marxismo, Marxism, hegemony, Populismo, nacional-popular, hegemonía, national-popular, Nacional-popular
Populism, Hegemonía, Gramsci, National-popular, marxismo, Hegemony, Marxismo, Marxism, hegemony, Populismo, nacional-popular, hegemonía, national-popular, Nacional-popular
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 187 | |
| downloads | 219 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts