Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Conference object . 2020
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Large scale in silico prediction of putative rhodopsin and secretin G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs) across multiple decapod species using a hybrid clustering/phylogenetics approach

Authors: Nguyen, Tuan V.; Tran, Nhut Minh; Ryan, Luke; Hyde, Cameron D.; Rotllant, Guiomar; Cummins, Scott F.; Elizur, Abigail; +1 Authors

Large scale in silico prediction of putative rhodopsin and secretin G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs) across multiple decapod species using a hybrid clustering/phylogenetics approach

Abstract

Order Decapoda consists of more than 8,000 species of crustaceans (phylum Arthropoda) that include shrimps, lobsters, crayfish, crab.... Despite their importance in terms of economic as well as ecological value, decapod crustacean’s neuropeptidergic components are currently not well characterized. The advancement of next generation sequencing technology has given the research community a tool to predict neuropeptides with an unprecedented pace. On the contrary, for neuropeptide’s receptors, specifically G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the characterization process is hindered due to the complexity of their structure. The traditional approach using molecular phylogenetics has several weaknesses including (1): manual curated GPCRs list that might bias the result, (2) is time and computationally demanding in increment of data size. In the current study, we present a hybrid approach of clustering and phylogenetics analysis to annotate the putative GPCRs in 10 different decapod species including Cancer borealis, Carcinus maenas, Cherax quadricarinatus, Eriochier sinensis, Gecarcinus lateralis, Homarus americanus, Nephrops norvegicus, Palinurus ornatus, Penaeus monodon, and Procambarus clarkii. This approach included clustering of GPCRs based on similarity, then validating the results at a finer resolution using phylogenetic analysis. A web browser that allow data mining (which includes the sequence of GPCRs, expression pattern, as well as gene ontology annotation) is also presented. This study provides a framework to further understand the roles of GPCRs in decapod crustaceans. Given that identification and annotation of GPCRs is hindered by the complexity of this large gene family, our hybrid approach can streamline further discovery at a greater pace and higher accuracy

The Crustacean Society Mid-Year Meeting (TSC 2019), 26-30 May 2019, Hong Kong.-- 1 page

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 35
  • 35
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
35
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research