Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

A fecal-culture model, monitoring gas production, for assessing prebiotics' fermentability in normal-weight and obese subjects

Authors: Nogacka, Alicja; Salazar, Nuria; Endo, Akihito; Suárez, Ana; Martinez-Faedo, Ceferino; González de los Reyes-Gavilán, Clara; Gueimonde Fernández, Miguel;

A fecal-culture model, monitoring gas production, for assessing prebiotics' fermentability in normal-weight and obese subjects

Abstract

[Background/Aims] The gut microbiota is altered in different conditions, which leads to the interest in prebiotics to restore it and to identify the best suited compounds. The use of fecal culture models provides an interesting strategy, allowing to identify prebiotics with suitable fermentation profiles, and appropriate microbiota-modulation properties, for each population. Here we aimed at comparing the fermentability and microbiota-modulation ability of different prebiotics, including the novel prebiotic 1-Kestose, in normal-weight and obese adults. [Methods] Fresh fecal samples from 9 normal-weight (BMI 40) volunteers were collected, transported to the laboratory (under anaerobic conditions), homogenized, diluted (10% v/v) into a carbohydrate-free basal medium and stabilized at 37°C in an anaerobiosis cabinet. The prebiotics tested (Actilight, Synergy, P95, Inulin, GOS and 1-kestose) were added (0.3%, w/v) to the stabilized fecal cultures and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Gas production along incubation was monitored in real-time by using the ANKOM RF System. Samples were taken at 0 and 24 hours of incubation for pH measurements, determination of short-chain-fatty-acids by gas chromatography and gut microbiota analyses by qPCR. [Results] In both volunteers’ groups kestose resulted the more fermentable prebiotic as indicated by the largest accumulation of gas and the lowest pH after incubation. On the contrary, inulin was the less fermentable compound. Interestingly, intestinal microbiota from obese individuals tended to show a lower ability to produce gas than that from normal-weight volunteers. The different prebiotics were able to induce changes in microbiota composition in both volunteer groups, although showing differences among them. [Conclusions] The fecal culture model used, with real-time monitoring of gas production, constitutes a fast and easy method for assessing the fermentability of prebiotics in different population groups. 1-kestose showed good characteristics suggesting its applicability as a readily fermentable prebiotic substrate for intestinal microbiota modulation.

Trabajo presentado en el 10th Workshop on Probiotics and Prebiotics (SEPyP 2019), celebrado en Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (España) del 6 al 8 de febrero de 2019

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 52
    download downloads 95
  • 52
    views
    95
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
52
95
Green