Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/19850
Extension in the northeastern Betics took place along two main directions, corresponding to a minimum of two successive orthogonal extensional systems with N–NW and W–SW sense of shear, respectively. Strain was strongly localised within weaker metapelites and gypsum, leading to the development of several extensional detachments, which accommodated the thinning produced by extensional ramps and listric faults within the stronger carbonate rocks. Extension along several detachments led to the preservation in a single thinned section of layers representative of different crustal depths of a previously thickened upper crust. The N- to NW-directed extensional system was formed by brittle to brittle–ductile detachments, which were active during the Upper Oligocene and Lower Miocene, coeval to vertical ductile thinning of underlying greenschist-facies metamorphic rocks. The W- to SW-directed extensional system, active during the Middle and Upper Miocene, shows multiple slip surfaces, which transferred displacement to a brittle detachment with a ramp-flat geometry that stepped down into the footwall of the previous NW-directed system. The geometry of both extensional systems was determined by the rheological heterogeneity of the studied crustal section. Further Upper Miocene extension was accommodated by radial extension with a dominant set of SW-directed listric faults, which tilted the aforementioned detachments and exhumed them in the core of km-scale elongated extensional domes.
The CICYT Spanish projects REN2001-3868-CO3-01/MAR, REN2001-3378 and FEDER funds of the UE supported the field and laboratory research
Peer reviewed
Northeastern Betics, Extensional detachments, Low-angle normal faults, Alboran crustal domain, Rheology, Crustal extension
Northeastern Betics, Extensional detachments, Low-angle normal faults, Alboran crustal domain, Rheology, Crustal extension
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 58 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 22 |

Views provided by UsageCounts