Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/19465
[ES] Solamente dos de los dieciocho pequeños fragmentos de la Cueva 7 de Qumrán han sido identificados como textos del Antiguo Testamento en la edición príncipe. Posteriormente J. O'Callaghan identificó algunos otros fragmentos can textos del Nuevo Testamento, iniciando una polémica que hoy continúa. La antara identifica el fragmento 5, punto clave en la teoría de J. O'Callaghan, con un texto veterotestamentario.
[EN] Only two out of the eighteen little fragments from Cave 7 of Qumran have been identified in the editio princeps as texts of the Old Testament. Later on J. O'Callaghan identified some other fragments with texts of the New Testament, opening a discussion which remains still alive. The author identifies fragment number 5 -the core in J. O’Callaghan’s theory- with an Old Testament text.
Peer reviewed
Filología bíblica, Filología clásica, Manuscritos del Mar Muerto
Filología bíblica, Filología clásica, Manuscritos del Mar Muerto
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 58 | |
| downloads | 68 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts