Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/187122
In this work, it is compared the performance of three commercial lipase preparations (Novozym 435, Lipozyme TL-IM, and Lipozyme RM-IM) in the synthesis of flavor esters obtained by esterification of acetic, propionic, and butyric acids using ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, butanol, or pentanol. A comprehensive comparison was performed verifying activities of these three enzyme preparations versus the different couples of substrates, checking the obtained yields. In general, the longer the acid chain, the higher the reaction yields. Novozym 435 was the most efficient enzyme in most cases, and only Lipozyme RM-IM offered better results than Novozym 435 in the production of ethyl butyrate. Reactions with butyric acid showed the highest conversion rates using all biocatalysts. Using optimal substrates, the reactions catalyzed by the three enzymes were optimized using the response surface methodology, and the catalytic performance of the biocatalysts in repeated batches was assessed. After optimization, yields higher than 90% were obtained for all three enzymes, but Lipozyme TL-IM needed four-times more biocatalyst content than the other two preparations. Novozym 435 kept over 80% of its activity when reused in 9 successive batches, whereas Lipozyme RM-IM can be reused 5 times and Lipozyme TL-IM only 3 times. In general, Novozym 435 showed to be more suitable for these reactions than the other two enzyme preparations.
This work was supported by grants and scholarships (first and second authors) from FAPERGS (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul process 11/0485-0 ARD/2011), CNPq (Brazilian Bureau of Science and Technology process 478169/2011-6 Universal 2011), and CTQ2009-07568 (Ministerio de Ciencia y Innovación, Spain).
Peer Reviewed
Esterification, Enzyme reuse, Lipase, Flavor esters, Immobilized enzyme
Esterification, Enzyme reuse, Lipase, Flavor esters, Immobilized enzyme
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 31 | |
| downloads | 25 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts