Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Meso‐aryl expanded porphyrins present a structural versatility that allows them to achieve different topologies with distinct aromaticities. Several studies appeared in the literature studying these topological switches from an experimental and theoretical point of view. Most of these publications include density functional theory calculations, being the B3LYP the most used methodology. In this work, we show that the selection of the functional has a critical role on the geometric, energetic, and magnetic results of these expanded porphyrins, and that the use of an inadequate methodology can even generate spurious stationary points on the potential energy surface. To illustrate these aspects, in this article we have studied different molecular distortions of two expanded porphyrins, [32]‐heptaphyrin and [26]‐hexaphyrin using 11 DFT functionals and performing single point energy calculations at the local pair natural orbital coupled cluster DLPNO‐CCSD(T) method, which have been carried out for benchmarking purposes. For some selected functionals, the dispersion effects have also been evaluated using the D3‐Grimme's dispersion correction with Becke–Johnson damping. Our results let us to conclude that the CAM‐B3LYP, M05‐2X, and M06‐2X functionals are the methodologies that provide a more consistent description of these topological switches, while other methods, such as B3LYP, BPE, and BP86, show a biased description. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Möbius, Funcional de densitat, Teoria del, Aromaticity, Spurious stationary points, DLPNO‐CCSD(T), Expanded porphyrin, Hückel, Aromaticity (Chemistry), Density functional theory methods, Aromaticitat (Química), Density functionals
Möbius, Funcional de densitat, Teoria del, Aromaticity, Spurious stationary points, DLPNO‐CCSD(T), Expanded porphyrin, Hückel, Aromaticity (Chemistry), Density functional theory methods, Aromaticitat (Química), Density functionals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 40 | |
| downloads | 105 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts