
handle: 10261/161861
In Spain, in the evaluation of the theses several academics contribute: supervisors, chairs and memberships of the academic assessment boards (AAB). Supervisors propose members of AAB and the PhD commissions from universities select these academics as members of the definitive AAB. This fact generates evident relationships between members that can be analysed and measured using indicators. Our objective is to propose indicators describing relations between supervisors involved in the academic assessment in the Spanish theses. These indicators, when applied to a complete set of theses in a specific field, can provide insights on relations of patronage and academic power between academics and contribute to drawn a picture of the field structure from a sociological point of view.
Trabajo presentado a la 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators: "Peripheries, frontiers and beyond", celebrada en Valencia (España) del 14 al 16 de septiembre de 2016.
Supported by MINECO (CSO2012-39632-C02-01) and Genalitat Valenciana (GVPrometeo2013-041).
Peer Reviewed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
