Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1111/jbi.12978
handle: 10261/143496 , 2066/168974 , 11573/1641136 , 11584/216465 , 11381/2869375 , 1893/24925
doi: 10.1111/jbi.12978
handle: 10261/143496 , 2066/168974 , 11573/1641136 , 11584/216465 , 11381/2869375 , 1893/24925
AbstractAimWe studied global variation in beta diversity patterns of lake macrophytes using regional data from across the world. Specifically, we examined (1) how beta diversity of aquatic macrophytes is partitioned between species turnover and nestedness within each study region, and (2) which environmental characteristics structure variation in these beta diversity components.LocationGlobal.MethodsWe used presence–absence data for aquatic macrophytes from 21 regions distributed around the world. We calculated pairwise‐site and multiple‐site beta diversity among lakes within each region using Sørensen dissimilarity index and partitioned it into turnover and nestedness coefficients. Beta regression was used to correlate the diversity coefficients with regional environmental characteristics.ResultsAquatic macrophytes showed different levels of beta diversity within each of the 21 study regions, with species turnover typically accounting for the majority of beta diversity, especially in high‐diversity regions. However, nestedness contributed 30–50% of total variation in macrophyte beta diversity in low‐diversity regions. The most important environmental factor explaining the three beta diversity coefficients (total, species turnover and nestedness) was elevation range, followed by relative areal extent of freshwater, latitude and water alkalinity range.Main conclusionsOur findings show that global patterns in beta diversity of lake macrophytes are caused by species turnover rather than by nestedness. These patterns in beta diversity were driven by natural environmental heterogeneity, notably variability in elevation range (also related to temperature variation) among regions. In addition, a greater range in alkalinity within a region, likely amplified by human activities, was also correlated with increased macrophyte beta diversity. These findings suggest that efforts to conserve aquatic macrophyte diversity should primarily focus on regions with large numbers of lakes that exhibit broad environmental gradients.
570, aquatic plants, 550, nestedness, species turnover, ddc:333.7-333.9, Hydrophytes, 333, freshwater ecosystem, Freshwater ecosystem, Spatial extent, Nestedness, elevation range, Alkalinity range, QH301 Biology / biológia, Aquatic plants, hydrophyte, nestedne, Latitude, 333.7-333.9, Species turnover, ddc:550, Freshwater ecosystems, Aquatic Ecology, alkalinity range, latitude, Elevation range, alkalinity range; aquatic plants; elevation range; freshwater ecosystem; hydrophytes; latitude; nestedness; spatial extent; species turnover, Altitudinal range, aquatic plant, hydrophytes, Ecological Microbiology, ta1181, spatial extent, QE Geology / földtudományok, ddc: ddc:550, ddc: ddc:333.7-333.9
570, aquatic plants, 550, nestedness, species turnover, ddc:333.7-333.9, Hydrophytes, 333, freshwater ecosystem, Freshwater ecosystem, Spatial extent, Nestedness, elevation range, Alkalinity range, QH301 Biology / biológia, Aquatic plants, hydrophyte, nestedne, Latitude, 333.7-333.9, Species turnover, ddc:550, Freshwater ecosystems, Aquatic Ecology, alkalinity range, latitude, Elevation range, alkalinity range; aquatic plants; elevation range; freshwater ecosystem; hydrophytes; latitude; nestedness; spatial extent; species turnover, Altitudinal range, aquatic plant, hydrophytes, Ecological Microbiology, ta1181, spatial extent, QE Geology / földtudományok, ddc: ddc:550, ddc: ddc:333.7-333.9
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 149 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 78 | |
| downloads | 44 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts