Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Publication of this consensus statement is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), intended to revise and update the diagnostic and treatment recommendations published 2 years ago on biomarker use and the management of patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC), thereby providing an opportunity to improve healthcare efficiency and resource use in these patients. This expert group recommends testing for KRAS and NRAS status in all patients with metastatic CRC being considered for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy, as this type of treatment should only be used in patients not harbouring mutations in these genes. In contrast, testing for BRAF, EGFR, PI3K and PTEN mutation status is not necessary for therapeutic decision making, so does not need to be done routinely.
EGFR, NRAS, Medical Oncology, Polymerase Chain Reaction, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Proto-Oncogene Proteins, KRAS, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Colorectal carcinomas, Societies, Medical, Receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico, Epidermal growth factor receptor, Membrane Proteins, CRC, ErbB Receptors, Biomarcadores, Spain, ras Proteins, Colorectal Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Carcinoma colorrectal
EGFR, NRAS, Medical Oncology, Polymerase Chain Reaction, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Proto-Oncogene Proteins, KRAS, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Colorectal carcinomas, Societies, Medical, Receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico, Epidermal growth factor receptor, Membrane Proteins, CRC, ErbB Receptors, Biomarcadores, Spain, ras Proteins, Colorectal Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Carcinoma colorrectal
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 59 | |
| downloads | 48 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts