Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/137589
Lorenzo Peña y Gonzalo ha desarrollado una lógica, una filosofía jurídica y un pensamiento político de naturaleza claramente neo-leibniziana. La impronta neo-leibniziana caracteriza tanto sus tesis filosóficas como los términos que ha acuñado en sus contribuciones a la teoría del conocimiento, la teodicea, la ontología, la filosofía política, etc., y está presente, sobre todo, en su concepción del Derecho y de la lógica de las situaciones jurídicas. Al hilo de problemas políticos y encrucijadas del presente, esta entrevista nos permite aproximamos a algunos de los hallazgos intelectuales de su obra.
Lorenzo Peña y Gonzalo has developed a logic, a legal philosophy and a political thought of a deeply neo-Leibnizian nature. The neo-Leibnizian mark characterizes both his philosophical thesis and the terms has coined in his contributions to the theory of knowledge, theodicy, ontology, political philosophy, etc. Above all, this mark is present in his conception of Law and of the logic of legal situations. Under the light of the political problems and crossroads of the present time, this interview allows for an approach to some of the intellectual findings in his work.
This is a dialog between the author, María G. Navarro, and Lorenzo Peña on the methodology of inquiry in the philosophy of law and several key issues of legal and political philosophy, such as the axiom of the common good, the concept of a justificative democracy and the history of juridical institutions
Peer reviewed
Democracia, Historia del Derecho, abducción, Derecho natural, racionalidad jurídica, Bien común
Democracia, Historia del Derecho, abducción, Derecho natural, racionalidad jurídica, Bien común
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 42 | |
| downloads | 33 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts