Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.3390/s150511988
handle: 10261/137433
This letter is the reply to: Remarks on Peinado et al.’s Analysis of J3Gen by J. Garcia-Alfaro, J. Herrera-Joancomartí and J. Melià-Seguí published in Sensors 2015, 15, 6217–6220. Peinado et al. cryptanalyzed the pseudorandom number generator proposed by Melià-Seguí et al., describing two possible attacks. Later, Garcia-Alfaro claimed that one of this attack did not hold in practice because the assumptions made by Peinado et al. were not correct. This letter reviews those remarks, showing that J3Gen is anyway flawed and that, without further information, the interpretation made by Peinado et al. seems to be correct.
Reply, Chemical technology, EPCglobal Gen2, pseudo random number generators, Pseudo random number generators, security, TP1-1185, Cryptanalytic attack, cryptanalytic attack, Security, Radio Frequency Identification
Reply, Chemical technology, EPCglobal Gen2, pseudo random number generators, Pseudo random number generators, security, TP1-1185, Cryptanalytic attack, cryptanalytic attack, Security, Radio Frequency Identification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 32 | |
| downloads | 38 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts