Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Archiv für Hydrobiologie
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Ectoenzymatic activities and heterotrophic bacteria decomposing detritus

Authors: Sala, M. Montserrat; Güde, Hans;

Ectoenzymatic activities and heterotrophic bacteria decomposing detritus

Abstract

One of the largest fluxes of carbon in most of the ecosystems is that from the detritus to microorganisms. Microbial ectoenzymes play a basic role in the degradation of detritus. However, the role of ectoenzymes in dependence of the detritus composition has not been studied. In a microcosm experiment we have followed the development of nine ectoenzymatic activities and hydrolytic bacteria during the degradation of four sources of detritus (macrophytes, algae, leaves and chitin). Throughout the degradation of algae and macrophytes, a succession of ectoenzymatic activities could be observed. This succession started with the hydrolysis of oligosaccharides and starch (high α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, exocellulase and amylase activities), and was followed by the hydrolysis of plant structural polysaccharides (endocellulase and endoxylanase activities). Such a succession was neither found in the enrichments with leaves, with lower peaks of activity, nor of chitin. This latter was characterized by a high chitinolytic activity and the highest alkaline phosphatase/peptidase ratio. Along the experiment, the number of hydrolytic colonies (amylolytic, cellulolytic, xylanolytic, chitinolytic) varied between 2-52 % of the total CFUs, amylolytic colonies generally being the most abundant (up to 35 % of total CPUs). For 20 isolates, their ability to hydrolyze starch, cellulose, xylane and chitin when offered as single carbon source was checked. Of the isolates, 55 % could use more than one polymer. Very likely, the ability to hydrolyze several carbon sources offers these bacteria the possibility to shift or even express simultaneously various enzymes. During the process of microbial decomposition of detritus shown here, characterized by changes in the available molecules, bacteria with the ability to hydrolyze several carbohydrates would have an advantage to persist in the system in contrast to bacteria that could only hydrolyze one of the tested polymers. In aquatic environments exposed to changing inputs of organic matter such as the littoral zones, bacteria with multiple hydrolytic potential would very likely show a better adaptation

The study was supported by the joint research project “Cycling of organic matter in Lake Constance”

15 pages, 6 figures, 1 table

Peer Reviewed

Keywords

Leaves, Algae, Polymers, Degradation of detritus, Chitin, Ectoenzymes, Macrophytes, Carbon fluxes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 36
  • 36
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
16
Top 10%
Average
Average
36
Green