Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/131721
One of the main challenges of fuzzy community detection problems is to be able to measure the quality of a fuzzy partition. In this paper, we present an alternative way of measuring the quality of a fuzzy community detection output based on n-dimensional grouping and overlap functions. Moreover, the proposed modularity measure generalizes the classical Girvan–Newman (GN) modularity for crisp community detection problems and also for crisp overlapping community detection problems. Therefore, it can be used to compare partitions of different nature (i.e. those composed of classical, overlapping and fuzzy communities). Particularly, as is usually done with the GN modularity, the proposed measure may be used to identify the optimal number of communities to be obtained by any network clustering algorithm in a given network. We illustrate this usage by adapting in this way a well-known algorithm for fuzzy community detection problems, extending it to also deal with overlapping community detection problems and produce a ranking of the overlapping nodes. Some computational experiments show the feasibility of the proposed approach to modularity measures through n-dimensional overlap and grouping functions.
Supported by the Government of Spain (grant TIN2012-32482), the Government of Madrid (grant S2013/ICCE-2845)
Peer reviewed
overlap functions, Internet topics, grouping functions, Overlap functions, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence, aggregation operators, Aggregation operators, Grouping functions
overlap functions, Internet topics, grouping functions, Overlap functions, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence, aggregation operators, Aggregation operators, Grouping functions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 52 | |
| downloads | 42 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts