Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We study a particular restitution problem where there is an indivisible good (land or property) over which two agents have rights: the dispossessed agent and the owner. A third party, possibly the government, seeks to resolve the situation by assigning rights to one and compensate the other. There is also a maximum amount of money available for the compensation. We characterize a family of asymmetrically fair rules that are immune to strategic behavior, guarantee minimal welfare levels for the agents, and satisfy the budget constraint.
fairness, strategy-proofness, indivisible good, land restitution, fairness, indivisible good, Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.), strategy-proofness, land restitution, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:D61
fairness, strategy-proofness, indivisible good, land restitution, fairness, indivisible good, Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.), strategy-proofness, land restitution, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:D61
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 73 | |
| downloads | 129 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts