Views provided by UsageCounts
The aim of this study was to couple biochemical and molecular methodologies for evaluating the impact of two recycling technologies (composting and vermicomposting) on a toxic organic waste. To do this, six enzyme activities controlling the key metabolic pathways of the breakdown of organic matter, real-time PCR assays targeting 16S rRNA genes, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiling-sequence analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA fragments have been used to determine the functional diversity, bacterial number, and bacterial community structure, respectively, in a mixture of olive waste and sheep manure, and in the derived compost and vermicompost. Both the recycling technologies were effective in activating the microbial parameters of the toxic waste, the vermicomposting being the best process to produce greater bacterial diversity, greater bacterial numbers and greater functional diversity. Although several identical populations were detected in the processed and non-processed materials, each technology modified the original microbial communities of the waste in a diverse way, indicating the different roles of each one in the bacterial selection.
Enzymes activities, Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), Colony Count, Microbial, Olive-mill waste, Models, Biological, Refuse Disposal, Recycling technology, Bacteria, Aerobic, Bioreactors, Bacterial diversity, Olea, Enzyme activities, Computer Simulation, DGGE, Organic Chemicals, Soil Microbiology
Enzymes activities, Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), Colony Count, Microbial, Olive-mill waste, Models, Biological, Refuse Disposal, Recycling technology, Bacteria, Aerobic, Bioreactors, Bacterial diversity, Olea, Enzyme activities, Computer Simulation, DGGE, Organic Chemicals, Soil Microbiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 195 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 39 |

Views provided by UsageCounts