Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/108525
This review deals with the analysis of mercury present in different types of solid, liquid and gaseous samples involved in the coal combustion process, focusing on the specific characteristics of each type of sample and the problems typically associated with these products. The main aim of the paper is to describe the methods that, at the current stage of development, are preferable in each case (i.e. the most frequently used in most laboratories and the standard methods). The advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed with reference to the quality of the results and the uncertainties involved in the evaluation of mercury behavior during coal combustion processes.
The work was performed thanks to several financial sources. The project CTM2004-04252-CO2-02/TECHNO from the Spanish National Research Plan, the support of CSIC (Spanish Nacional Research Council) for providing M. Antonia López-Antón with a postdoctoral position, and the help of the Asturias Research Programme for funding both a doctoral fellowship for Raquel Ochoa-González and the project PC10-20.
Peer reviewed
Mercury analysis, Coal-fired power plants, Mercury speciation, Mercury
Mercury analysis, Coal-fired power plants, Mercury speciation, Mercury
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 45 | |
| downloads | 600 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts