Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Capacidad de absorción: Una revisión de los artículos empíricos

Authors: Ferreras-Méndez, José Luis; Alegre-Vidal, Joaquín; Fernández-Mesa, Anabel;

Capacidad de absorción: Una revisión de los artículos empíricos

Abstract

El objetivo del presente trabajo es evaluar el apoyo empírico que ha recibido el concepto ¿capacidad de absorción?. Defendemos que a pesar de la amplia presencia del concepto en la literatura sobre dirección estratégica, aún no existe un consenso en cuanto a su definición, las dimensiones que lo componen y la escala de medición. Así mismo, la mayor parte de los estudios que evalúan la medición del concepto lo realizan de forma descriptiva, sin mostrar de forma sistemática el nivel de apoyo empírico recibido. Para dar respuesta a este gap fue examinada una muestra de 506 tests provenientes de 62 artículos empíricos, para los cuales se emplearon criterios de selección específicos y relevantes. Tras la revisión teórica, nuestros resultados resaltan que la validez del concepto varía considerablemente según el enfoque planteado y del tipo de variable independiente y dependiente estudiada. Así mismo, pocos académicos, han incorporado en sus mediciones el aspecto multidimensional del concepto limitándose a medirlo a través de aproximaciones como son la I+D, el conocimiento previo y las patentes.

Trabajo presentado al XXV Congreso Anual de la Asociación Europea de Dirección y Economía de Empresa: "Los mercados del mañana: Bases para su análisis hoy", celebrado en Valencia del 8 al 10 de junio de 2011.

Peer Reviewed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green