Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Recolector de Cienci...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
DIGITAL.CSIC
Conference object . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DIGITAL.CSIC
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy regional metabolic profiles: differences among hippocampal formation, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum in adult rats using a machine learning approach

Authors: Guadaño-Ferraz, Ana; Fernández-Lamo, Iván; Pacheco-Torres, Jesús; Gómez-Andrés, David; Pulido-Valdeolivas, Irene; López-Larrubia, Pilar; Montero-Pedrazuela, Ana;

In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy regional metabolic profiles: differences among hippocampal formation, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum in adult rats using a machine learning approach

Abstract

1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) is a non-invasive technology that provides information about several metabolite levels among multiple brain regions. This technology is widely used in preclinical and neuroscience research and in diagnosis in neurological practice. Although CNS is highly heterogeneous, few studies have been focused on interregional differences in 1H-MRS metabolic profiles and fewer, if any, have used multivariate approaches. Our aim is the development of a methodology to compare 1H-MRS metabolic profiles in order to improve the 1H-MRS result interpretation. In vivo spectra were acquired with a 7T PharmaScan® System (voxel size 27 mm3 and PRESS sequence, TE=35 ms) and fitted with LCModel. To avoid variance in signals, metabolite levels were normalized to NAA (N-Acetyl Aspartate). Four ratios to NAA were obtained: NAA+NAAG (NAA+N-Acetyl Aspartyl Glutamate), Cr+PCr (total Creatine), GPC+PCh (total Choline) and Glx (Glutamate+Glutamine) in hippocampal formation, prefrontal cortex and cerebellum from adult Wistar rats, aged 80, 105 and 130 days (n=8 each condition). Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forests (RF) and supervised neural networks (SNN) were used to classify brain regions according to age and NAA ratios. Cohen¿s kappa and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were respectively calculated to measure global performance of each approach and each region in particular. Confidence intervals were calculated by bootstrapping. To measure discriminating importance of each dependent variable, the correlations among them and linear discriminant functions in LDA and the mean decrease in accuracy in RF were used. LDA, RF and SNN were able to discriminate among regions (Table 1). LDA showed the best global fitting. Compared to the others, the cerebellum metabolic profile was the most different. Cr+PCr and Glx were important in separating cerebellum and hippocampal formation respectively. Age was not an important factor in the models. This study provides a valid methodology to explore 1H-MRS interregional metabolic profiles detecting significant regional differences that are important in 1H-MRS result interpretation. This fact should be considered in clinical context.

Resumen del póster presentado al Neuroscience celebrado en Nueva Orleans (USA) del 13 al 17 de octubre de 2012.

Peer Reviewed

Country
Spain
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 19
    download downloads 42
  • 19
    views
    42
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
19
42
Green