Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 10261/103885
This paper discusses a conflict between private defence firms and government procurement agencies related to Intellectual Property management issues that emerged during the privatization process of the main UK defence research establishment. Our analysis questions a common argument found in studies of the defence industries: that a close confluence of interests exists between private suppliers and their public customers, so much so that the boundaries between public and private actors become blurred. Instead, we argue that the tensions between private suppliers and their government customers are jeopardizing the success of process innovations in defence procurement that rely on >partnership> and collaboration between defence and government customers and users. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
This paper is based on research carried out by the authors in the study “Managing IPR in Shared Digital Environments”, jointly funded by the UK Economic Social Research Council “E-Society Programme”, and the UK Ministry of Defence under the Joint Grants Scheme (ESRC Award Reference RES-335-25-0017).
Peer Reviewed
Defence procurement, Intellectual property, Privatization
Defence procurement, Intellectual property, Privatization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 35 | |
| downloads | 22 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts