Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Research Repository ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Razonamiento cautelar en el proceso civil

Authors: Gajardo Zúñiga, Pablo;

Razonamiento cautelar en el proceso civil

Abstract

This paper adopts the principles of the rationalist conception of evidence and examines the requirements that precautionary measures must—or should—meet in civil proceedings. First, it questions the use of plausibility as a “standard” to establish the fumus boni iuris, proposing instead its replacement with a mitigated probability threshold. Second, with regard to periculum in mora, the need to adjust certain elements of evidentiary reasoning (inductive probability) is addressed, proposing a differentiated theoretical framework for the assessment of evidence concerning propositions about future events (statistical probability). Finally, the study examines the particular nature of precautionary error as a special type of judicial error. Given the instrumental, provisional, and urgent nature of precautionary measures, any proposal for a precautionary standard must take into account non-epistemic factors, such as the severity of the measure, the available information, the procedural stage, and the legal interests at stake

Este trabajo asume los postulados de la concepción racional de la prueba y analiza los requisitos que deben o deberían cumplir las medidas cautelares en el proceso civil. Primero, se cuestiona la verosimilitud como “estándar” para acreditar el fumus boni iuris, proponiendo sustituir la verosimilitud por una probabilidad atenuada. Segundo, para el periculum in mora, se plantea la necesidad de ajustar ciertos elementos del razonamiento probatorio (probabilidad inductiva), proponiendo un marco teórico diferenciado para el tratamiento de la prueba de proposiciones respecto de hechos futuros (probabilidad estadística). Finalmente, se aborda la particularidad del error cautelar como tipo especial de error judicial: dada la naturaleza instrumental, provisional y de urgencia de las medidas cautelares, una propuesta de estándar cautelar debe considerar elementos no epistémicos para su determinación, tales como la gravedad de la medida, la información disponible, el estado del procedimiento y los bienes jurídicos involucrados

16

Country
Spain
Keywords

Procediment civil, Error judicial , Càrrega de la prova, Civil procedure, Burden of proof, Judicial error

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Fields of Science
Fields of Science
Related to Research communities
Spanish Research Portal
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!