
to evaluate bacteremias caused during endoscopic examination of the digestive tract.prospective study of randomly selected patients who underwent digestive system endoscopic examination. Emergency endoscopic examinations were excluded.a total of 102 patients were analyzed. Of 44 patients who underwent gastroscopy, 11 (25%) subsequently had positive blood culture, and Staphylococcus spp and Streptococcus spp were isolated. Of 30 patients who underwent colonoscopy, 3 (10%) had positive blood cultures, and Staphylococcus spp were isolated. Of 28 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, 11 (39.2%) had positive blood cultures, and Escherichia coli, Morganella morganii, Staphylococcus spp and Streptococcus spp were isolated. No deaths, endocarditis or other septic phenomena were attributed to bacteremia.the incidence of bacteremia ranged from 10% to 39% depending on the type of endoscopy. The microorganisms that were isolated most frequently were Staphylococcus spp and Streptococcus spp. Gram-negative bacilli and enterobacteria were isolated in patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Bacteria, Bacteremia, Middle Aged, Humans, Female, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Prospective Studies, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde, Male, Time Factors, Adolescent, Bacteria, Bacteremia, Middle Aged, Humans, Female, Endoscopy, Digestive System, Prospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
