Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Acute psychologic stress reactivity in blacks versus whites:relationship to psychologic characteristics.

Authors: , Haeri; , Mills; , Nelesen; , Berry; , Ziegler; , Dillon; , Dimsdale;

Acute psychologic stress reactivity in blacks versus whites:relationship to psychologic characteristics.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine relationships among ethnicity, reactivity to acute stress and psychologic characteristics. DESIGN: We measured cardiovascular parameters and catecholamine levels at rest and after stress in a group of black and white men and women (45 blacks and 40 whites). METHODS: Blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance and catgecholamine measures of reactivity to a speaking stressor task were recorded. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine relationships between stress responsivity and psychologic characteristics in black and white subjects. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that systolic and diastolic blood pressure reactivity was lower in blacks than in whites (P < 0.01). A multiple regression model that treated reactivity as a function of psychologic attributes and ethnicity suggested that psychologic attributes differentially affect racial physiologic reactivity. For example, expression of anger was related to lower blood pressure changes in whites but higher blood pressure changes in blacks. Conversely, hostility was related to increased blood pressure reactivity in whites but lower blood pressure reactivity in blacks. Greater task-induced changes in heart rate and stroke volume were related to higher depression scores in blacks but lower depression scores in whites. In addition, the relationship between coping style, anger, anxiety, and stress and catecholamine reactivity in blacks and whites. CONCLUSION: Our findings support those of previous studies; we identified racial differences in stress reactivity and psychologic characteristics that affect reactivity differently in blacks and whites.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!