
handle: 10216/54033
We present an analysis of four different algorithms used to register plantar pressure images: a first one based on the matching of the external contours of the feet, a second algorithm based on the technique of phase correlation, a third one based on the direct optimization of the cross-correlation (CC) and using the Fourier transform, and a fourth and last algorithm that is based on the iterative optimization of an intensity (dis)similarity measure. In terms of accuracy, the later algorithm achieved the best registration results; on the other hand, the algorithm based on the matching of contours was the fastest, but its accuracy was inferior to the accuracy of the remaining algorithms.
Engineering and technology::Mechanical engineering, Biomecânica, Engenharia mecânica, Biomechanics, Mechanical engineering, Ciências da engenharia e tecnologias::Engenharia mecânica
Engineering and technology::Mechanical engineering, Biomecânica, Engenharia mecânica, Biomechanics, Mechanical engineering, Ciências da engenharia e tecnologias::Engenharia mecânica
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
