Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Engagement in breast cancer screening behaviors.

Authors: D R, Lauver; J, Kane; J, Bodden; J, McNeel; L, Smith;

Engagement in breast cancer screening behaviors.

Abstract

To distinguish women who engaged in recommended breast cancer screening from those who did not.Descriptive design, with quantitative measures.Urban, county hospital serving many low-income clients.119 women, age 51 to 80, who had not had mammograms in the last 13 months.Nurse-conducted telephone interviews that incorporated a modified Profile of Mood States, Attitudes Towards Mammography Scale, Barriers Scale, and reports of engagement in mammography and clinical breast exam (CBE) in the last 13 months and breast self-exam (BSE) practice in the last 3 months.Affect, beliefs, facilitators, and knowledge regarding screening; engagement in mammography, CBE, and BSE.In discriminant analyses of engagement in mammography and CBE, affect, barriers, prior history of breast problems, and race were significant variables. In discriminant analysis of BSE, history of breast biopsy, family history of breast cancer, beliefs about screening and cancer, prior instruction in BSE, and being single were significant variables.Variables that discriminated between use and non-use of professional screening were different from those that discriminated between use and non-use of BSE.Nurses can promote professional breast screening by addressing women's negative affect, prior breast concerns, and barriers, especially among Caucasians. Nurses can promote monthly BSE by supporting realistic beliefs about screening and cancer as well as by demonstrating BSE, especially among married women.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Breast Self-Examination, Discriminant Analysis, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Female, Physical Examination, Aged, Mammography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!