Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ DSpace at the Univer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Towards Interpretable Autonomy: Predicting Terrain Ruggedness, Fatigue, and Obstacle Presence in Agricultural Environments

Authors: Govers, Megan E.;

Towards Interpretable Autonomy: Predicting Terrain Ruggedness, Fatigue, and Obstacle Presence in Agricultural Environments

Abstract

Autonomous agricultural machines offer a promising solution to agri-food labour shortages; however, these machines face additional challenges when navigating off-road, often encountering rough terrain which can damage vehicles and reduce autonomous navigation accuracy. Unfortunately, adoption remains limited due to concerns about safety, liability, cost, and lack of trust amongst end-users. This thesis investigated the use of interpretable machine learning for the autonomous perception tasks of terrain roughness prediction and classification, fatigue damage estimation, and obstacle detection Terrain roughness was quantified using the ruggedness coefficient, defined as the ratio of vertical acceleration to vehicle speed. For each model, the input feature set included LiDAR-derived terrain features and vehicle kinematics. A Decision Tree classifier was trained to predict whether ruggedness coefficients exceeded a threshold associated with increased risk of adverse effects. It achieved 99.6% accuracy using only two features (vehicle speed and maximum point-to-plane distance of a plane encompassing the tractor). Using these two features, a Gradient Boosting regressor was trained to predict ruggedness coefficients (R^2 = 0.88). These models enable terrain roughness estimation prior to traversal, supporting path optimization to avoid high-magnitude events which may cause damage or disrupt navigation. Relationships between terrain characteristics, vehicle kinematics, and fatigue damage were also investigated. Fatigue was quantified at the chassis using the Rupp Filter and the Durability Transfer Concept. While the machine learning models did not successfully predict fatigue damage, analysis indicated that most damage occurred in the 0-2Hz frequency band. This coincides with the known frequency range of terrain-induced excitation. Surprisingly, the greatest accumulation of damage occurred during on-road driving, likely due to increased tractor speeds and harder driving surfaces. Finally, a Decision Tree model for real-time obstacle detection was developed. Reusing features from the ruggedness coefficient task, this model achieved an accuracy of 74% and an evaluation time of 23ms, outperforming uninterpretable models identified in literature. This research demonstrates that interpretable machine learning models which leverage LiDAR and vehicle dynamics can enable accurate, efficient, and transparent perception models for off-road autonomous vehicles, supporting greater trust and technology adoption amongst farmers.

Country
Canada
Related Organizations
Keywords

obstacle detection, machine learning, LiDAR, terrain roughness, agricultural vehicles, machine vision, autonomous vehicles

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green