Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia.

Authors: D S, Rosa; J L, Febbraro;

Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia.

Abstract

To evaluate laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ablation zone size and its relationship to refractive and visual outcomes in the treatment of hyperopia.We evaluated retrospectively 40 eyes of 20 patients who had LASIK: 20 eyes had a refractive ablation zone ranging from 5.5 to 9.0 mm (Group 1); Group 2 consisted of 20 eyes with a refractive ablation zone from 5.5 to 8.25 mm. We used the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser and the Hansatome microkeratome. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was +2.72 D in Group 1 and +2.75 D in Group 2. Objective refraction and visual acuity were evaluated over 6 months in both groups.Six months after LASIK, mean spherical equivalent refraction in Group 1 was +1.00 +/- 0.84 D and in Group 2 it was +0.75 +/- 0.42 D. One patient in Group 1 lost 1 line of spectacle-corrected visual acuity; none in Group 2 lost lines. Six patients gained 1 to 3 lines from their preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity.LASIK provides good results for mild and moderate hyperopia. LASIK with an ablation zone from 5.5 to 8.25 mm showed better predictability and more stable results. However, corneal diameter and the thickness and width of the flap appear to be important factors in the feasibility of LASIK in hyperopic eyes.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Visual Acuity, Corneal Topography, Refraction, Ocular, Cornea, Corneal Transplantation, Eyeglasses, Hyperopia, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Humans, Female, Laser Therapy, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!