Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Research Repository ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Research Repository UCD
Master thesis . 2026
Research Repository UCD
Master thesis . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
addClaim

An examination of the use of online tools for evaluation and impact assessment of multi-actor innovation in the beef advisory services in Europe in the context of COVID-19

Authors: O'Connor, Michael;

An examination of the use of online tools for evaluation and impact assessment of multi-actor innovation in the beef advisory services in Europe in the context of COVID-19

Abstract

In 2021, the multi-actor innovation project, LIAISON, outlined a set of new Impact Assessment and Evaluation (IAE) tools co-designed to enhance interactive innovation. The overall aim of this study was to examine a selection of these IAE tools with actors involved in a Thematic Network Project (BovINE) which supported networking of beef advisory services in the EU. The study determined users’ experiences of a selection of these IAE tools, and provides learnings from applying distance evaluation approaches and initiatives in a COVID-19 context, as many challenges related to adapting activities to an online scenario were addressed in this study. A Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach was used in this study with participants from the BovINE Project in three distinct phases. The first phase selected certain IAE tools from the LIAISON Project; the second phase trialled the selected IAE tools; and the third phase determined the experiences/learnings of implementing these IAE tools in a COVID-19 context. A qualitative approach was used to collect experiences, including methods such as observation research, field notes from one-to-one interactions, and a focus group discussion. Reflective practice and peer debriefing were used to guide and inform the PAR process. There were three suitable types of end-users identified, namely network managers (NMs), technical working group leaders (TWGLs) and the project management team (PMT), and shortlists of tools were developed for them. Five IAE tools were trialled in total in this study: two with the full consortium (all of the members actively involved in the BovINE Project) facilitated by the researcher; one self-assessment tool implemented by the researcher; and two IAE tools implemented by the NMs and TWGLs. The IAE tools were reported by the end-users to have a number of benefits, such as the ability to bring structure, focus, discipline and conclusions to interactions with the participants. However, there were also challenges determined, such as the time it takes to prepare for the implementation of the IAE tools, or the amount of personnel needed to implement them (online situation). Some of the online tools such as Mural (digital whiteboard collaboration space) were found to be very beneficial for facilitating participatory exercises. Overall the study concluded that there were many challenges, learnings and implications associated with trialling the IAE tools in the COVID-19 context. The ability of beef farmers to participate in online activities was low, and this negatively affected their level of interaction, which may have been avoided if they were trained to use the online tools prior implementation. That said, there was a strong preference for continuing a large portion of The BovINE Project’s work online. The EU context presented a significant challenge with language, and there was no clear solution identified, other than using simple language that could be easily translated.

2026-03-09 JG: Author's and/or other hand signatures removed for GDPR compliance

Country
Ireland
Related Organizations
Keywords

Agricultural innovation, Multi-actor approach, Impact assessment and evaluation, COVID-19 context

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!