The "antecedents, continuity and projections" of Neoplatonism are revised, priming the individual and communitary intertextuality, as the médium of study most valid for a train of thought that gives priority to the doctrinal body rather than to the individual. In this way are seen the diverse neoplatonic systems (Greek, Byzantine, Gnostic.) although it is also noted that, when this doctrinal aspect is weakened, Neoplatonism may externally influence the doctrines and philosophical authors who are very different from its spirit (Christians, Jews, Islamic, renaissentists, modern and contemporary).