
Managed care creates several dilemmas for the physician executive. Effective management is hindered by lack of analytical tools that stem from current limitations in outcomes research and treatment protocols, altered financial incentives that are controversial and that seem at odds with traditional incentives, and values that create conflict between the needs and expectations of individual patients and populations or groups under managed care. The executive must manage a process that resolves apparent conflict in an explicit ethical framework that acknowledges the limitations of data, with full awareness of the potential conflict between financial incentives and clinical judgement.
Financial Management, Social Values, Conflict of Interest, Negotiating, Managed Care Programs, United States, Physician Executives, Physician Incentive Plans, Ethics, Institutional, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Financial Management, Social Values, Conflict of Interest, Negotiating, Managed Care Programs, United States, Physician Executives, Physician Incentive Plans, Ethics, Institutional, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
