
A dilemma often faced by healthcare financial managers is whether to describe a potential investment project to organizational decision-makers in terms of the projects' internal rates of return (IRR) or to use the net present value (NPV) method. The IRR represents an intuitively appealing method of measuring investment value, but a number of conceptual and methodological problems associated with IRR measurement would seem to argue the use of the NPV method. Unfortunately, while the NPV measure is theoretically valid, it lacks the intuitive appeal of the IRR in communicating the value of investment alternatives. This article details an alternative method of measuring return that incorporates all the intuitive appeal of the conventional IRR, but few of the shortcoming associated with that measure.
Models, Statistical, Capital Expenditures, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Income, Investments, Financial Management, Hospital, United States
Models, Statistical, Capital Expenditures, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Income, Investments, Financial Management, Hospital, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
