
The authors address three issues associated with the implementation of the model proposed by Hsiao, et al. First, the mathematical model used and its underlying assumption, in particular as it relates to "time," is questioned. Second, the authors argue that measured rather than perceived (surveyed) data should be used whenever possible. This is particularly true for "time." Third, the authors raise the possibility that adjustments can and should be made based on the type and average complexity of examinations performed at different facilities. The potential implications of RBRVS reimbursement schemes on the practice of diagnostic radiology are significant and, once implement, they will be difficult to alter.
Radiography, Models, Statistical, Time and Motion Studies, Radiology, Relative Value Scales, United States
Radiography, Models, Statistical, Time and Motion Studies, Radiology, Relative Value Scales, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
