
The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of color and power Doppler imaging in thyroid nodules. The following 4 items were compared between malignant thyroid nodules (34 cases) and benign nodules (51 cases): 1) vascularity; 2) distribution of tumor vessels (none, marginal, peripheral, central); 3) nature of tumor vessels (tortuosity, interruption); and 4) FFT analysis. The distribution of tumor vessels on color Doppler images, nature of tumor vessels on power Doppler images, and the indices of PI, RI, and ATI in FFT analysis were useful in making the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign nodules. In terms of vascularity, including the distribution of tumor vessels on power Doppler images and nature of tumor vessels on color Doppler images, no statistically significant differences were found between malignant and benign nodules. Power Doppler images depicted tumor vessels in more detail than color Doppler images and were considered to extend the application of FFT analysis.
Diagnosis, Differential, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Thyroid Nodule, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
Diagnosis, Differential, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Thyroid Nodule, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
