Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ DSpace at Tartu Univ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

M(a,B,c)-ideaalid Banachi ruumides

Authors: Rozhinskaya, Ksenia;

M(a,B,c)-ideaalid Banachi ruumides

Abstract

In their 1973 paper “Structure in real Banach spaces” [AE], E. Alfsen and E. Effros introduced the notion of an M-ideal. It turned out that a closed subspace of a Banach space that is an M-ideal enjoys some properties (e.g. uniqueness of a norm-preserving extension) which do not necessarily occur in arbitrary subspaces. In [GKS], G. Godefroy, N. Kalton and P. Saphar introduced the notion of an ideal. It allowed them to make a connection between M-ideals and u-ideals, which were first introduced in [CK]. They also presented a natural strengthening of the definition of a u-ideal, an h-ideal. Another important step towards the generalization of previously studied ideals was made by J. Cabello and E. Nieto in [CN], where they defined an M(r; s)-ideal. The idea of studying M(a;B; c)-ideals dates back to a paper [O1] by E. Oja from 2000. In [OZ], one finds the following definition. Let a, c > 0 and let B K be a compact set of scalars. We shall say that a Banach space X satisfies the M(a;B; c)-inequality if kax + b Xx k + ck Xx k 6 kx k 8b 2 B; 8x 2 X ; where X : X ! X is the canonical projection. Based on this definition, we define an M(a;B; c)-ideal for an arbitrary closed subspace and aim to study some properties of M(a;B; c)-ideals. The pursuit to studyM(a;B; c)-ideals is motivated by the fact that the definition of anM(a;B; c)- ideal encompasses all previously studied special cases of ideals and makes it possible to handle them with a more unified approach. This bachelor thesis consists of four chapters. In the first chapter, we give a brief overview of some basic definitions and results required for further work. In the second chapter, we introduce the notion of an M(a;B; c)-ideal and study some basic properties of M(a;B; c)-ideals. We also take a closer look at M-, u- and h-ideals. The aim of the third chapter is to study M(a;B; c)-ideals in particular Banach spaces. First we give necessary and sufficient conditions for a one-dimensional subspace of a Banach space `2 1 to be an M(a;B; c)-ideal in `2 1. We also provide a theoretical result which can be used to derive examples of M(a;B; c)-ideals in L(X). In the fourth chapter, we study the transitivity of M(a;B; c)-inequality. First we show that ideal projections are closely connected to Hahn-Banach extension operators. Using this knowledge, we show as a first main result of this bachelor thesis that if X is an M(a;B; c)-ideal in Y and Y is an M(d;E; f)-ideal in Z, then X is an ideal satisfying a certain type of inequality in Z. Relying on this result, we show as a second main result of this thesis that if X is an M(a;B; c)-ideal in its second bidual X , then X is an ideal satisfying a certain type of inequality in X(2n) for every n 2 N.

Country
Estonia
Related Organizations
Keywords

bakalaureusetööd, Banachi ruuumid, funktsionaalanalüüs

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green