
handle: 10045/2080 , 11441/156475
This paper compares two parsing strategies: bidirectional bottom-up parsing with top-down predictions (BBP) and standard chart parsing. We demonstrate that BBP is superior to classical chart parsers from a linguistic and computational points of view. The efficiency of BBP results from two factors: first, top-down predictions bring about an algorithmic improvement, and, second, the memory model, the data structures and the programming techniques incorporate notable computational improvements.
Parsing, Top-down predictions, Bidirectional bottom-up parsing
Parsing, Top-down predictions, Bidirectional bottom-up parsing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
