Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ UPCommons. Portal de...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Recolector de Ciencia Abierta, RECOLECTA
Conference object . 2013
License: CC BY NC ND
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Evaluación del Trabajo de Fin de Grado

Authors: Sánchez Carracedo, Fermín; Climent Vilaró, Joan; Corbalán González, Julita; Fonseca Casas, Pau; García Almiñana, Jordi; Herrero Zaragoza, José Ramón; Llinàs Audet, Francisco Javier; +2 Authors

Evaluación del Trabajo de Fin de Grado

Abstract

Los Proyectos de Fin de Carrera (PFC) se han evaluado tradicionalmente a partir de una memoria y de una presentación pública. Esta evaluación, en general, la realiza un tribunal formado por varios profesores, que juzga de forma integral el proyecto a partir de la documentación entregada y de su presentación pública. Para poner la nota final los centros no disponen, en general, de unos criterios claros y precisos, por lo que cada tribunal usa su propia experiencia previa para decidir la nota de cada proyecto. Los Trabajos de Fin de Grado (TFG) substituyen en los nuevos planes de estudios de las ingenierías a los antiguos PFC. La evaluación de los TFG debe considerar, de forma explícita, tanto las competencias específicas como las genéricas, y es necesario que existan criterios claros sobre la forma de evaluarlas. Para avanzar en este sentido, el Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación y la Agencia para la Calidad del Sistema Universitario de Catalunya financiaron en 2008 y 2009 el proyecto “Guía para la evaluación de competencias en los Trabajos de Fin de Grado y de Máster en las Ingenierías”. Esta guía es, en realidad, una guía para ayudar a que cada centro/titulación defina su propio procedimiento de evaluación del TFG. En este trabajo se presenta una implementación de las propuestas contenidas en la guía y se define una metodología para evaluar los TFG a partir de las competencias que se trabajan en la titulación de Grado en Ingeniería Informática de la Facultat d’Informàtica de Barcelona. La metodología puede ser fácilmente replicada o adaptada para otros centros y otras titulaciones, lo que puede facilitar la realización de su propia guía de evaluación de los TFG.

Final Degree Projects (FDP) have traditionally been evaluated from a project report and a public presentation. This assessment is generally performed by a panel of several teachers who judg comprehensively the project from the documentation provided and analyze the public presentation. In general, schools do not have clear and precise criteria to set the final grade, as each panel uses its own previous experience to decide the mark of each project. The Bachelor Degree Thesis (BDT) replaced the former FDP in the new engineering curricula. Evaluation of FDP should consider explicitly both specific and professional skills, and clear criteria on how to assess competencies is required. To advance in this issue, the Ministry of Science and Innovation and the Quality Agency for the University System in Catalonia funded in 2008 and 2009 the project "Guía para la evaluación de competencias en los Trabajos de Fin de Grado y de Master en las Ingenierías". This guide is actually a guide to help each school / degree to define its own procedure for assessing the BDT. This paper presents an implementation of the suggestions contained in the guide and defines a methodology for assessing the BDT considering the professional skills trained in the Computer Engineering Degree from the Barcelona School of Informatics. The methodology can be easily replicated or adapted for other centres and degrees, which can facilitate the realization of its own guidance for the BDT evaluation.

Country
Spain
Keywords

Proyectos de Fin de Carrera, Trabajos de Fin de Grado, Evaluación de TFG, Evaluación de competencias genéricas, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ensenyament i aprenentatge, Informàtica -- Ensenyament, Computer science -- Study and teaching

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 39
    download downloads 26
  • 39
    views
    26
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
39
26
Green
Related to Research communities
Spanish Research Portal