
handle: 10044/1/24895
Aerosol deposition in the respiratory airways has traditionally been examined in terms of the Stokes number based on the reference flow timescale. This choice leads to large scatter in deposition efficiency when plotted against the reference Stokes number because the velocity and length scales experienced by advected particles deviate considerably from the reference values. A time-average of the particle local Stokes number should be adopted instead. Our results demonstrate that this average, or effective, Stokes number can deviate significantly from the reference value, in particular in the intermediate Stokes number range where variation across subjects is largest.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
