
handle: 10037/32439
There has been limited examination of the current and potential capacity of the UN human rights mechanisms to effectively engage in preventive measures. The international community, mainly through the UN Security Council, focuses on peaceful conflict resolution, mediation and political interventions, narrowing the scope of atrocity prevention to security, diplomacy and politics. However, by reassessing the stages of atrocities from a human rights violations perspective, international human rights mechanisms can develop timely and effective early warning systems. The research focuses on the role of the UN human rights mechanisms in preventing atrocity crimes and risk factors analysis of gross human rights violations categorized as atrocity crimes. By analysing prevention tools developed by the UN institutions, the research intends to contribute to a better understanding of their capacity, limitations, and potential areas for improvement in preventing atrocity crimes. The investigation aims to provide insights for future efforts of atrocities prevention in Ukraine and enhance the effectiveness of international human rights mechanisms in the early warning and risk assessment for atrocities. The research highlights the importance of improving the theory and practice of atrocity prevention, considering the severe consequences of inaction to prevent the escalation of atrocity crimes in Ukraine.
atrocity prevention, atrocity crimes, Ukraine, risk factors, early warning, urgent actions, the United Nations mechanisms, Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
atrocity prevention, atrocity crimes, Ukraine, risk factors, early warning, urgent actions, the United Nations mechanisms, Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
