
pmid: 10029502
pmc: PMC1070341
To examine the conceptual bases for the conflicting views of excess capacity in healthcare markets and their application in the context of today's turbulent environment.The policy and research literature of the past three decades.The theoretical perspectives of alternative economic schools of thought are used to support different policy positions with regard to excess capacity. Changes in these policy positions over time are linked to changes in the economic and political environment of the period. The social values implied by this history are articulated.Standard library search procedures are used to identify relevant literature.Alternative policy views of excess capacity in healthcare markets rely on differing theoretical foundations. Changes in the context in which policy decisions are made over time affect the dominant theoretical framework and, therefore, the dominant policy view of excess capacity.In the 1990s, multiple perspectives of optimal capacity still exist. However, our evolving history suggests a set of persistent values that should guide future policy in this area.
Health Services Needs and Demand, Economic Competition, Social Values, Health Policy, Health Care Sector, Efficiency, Organizational, Organizational Innovation, United States, Models, Economic, Hospital Administration, Hospital Bed Capacity, Humans, Attitude to Health, Decision Making, Organizational
Health Services Needs and Demand, Economic Competition, Social Values, Health Policy, Health Care Sector, Efficiency, Organizational, Organizational Innovation, United States, Models, Economic, Hospital Administration, Hospital Bed Capacity, Humans, Attitude to Health, Decision Making, Organizational
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
