Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Web-based Archive of...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Population-attributable risks and the health of the Dutch population

Populatie attributieve risico's
Authors: Verschuren WMM; Achterberg PW; Bijnen FCH; Bueno de Mesquita HB; Feskens EJM; Leer EM van; Peeters PHM; +3 Authors

Population-attributable risks and the health of the Dutch population

Abstract

In this report population-attributable risks (PARs) are reported, which quantify the contribution of several determinants (lifestyle factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity and dietary factors, as well as biological risk factors such as total serum cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose tolerance and body mass index) to mortality from a number of chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, stroke, COPD, diabetes and some forms of cancer). Relative risks and prevalences of risk factors are needed for calculations of PAR's. Relative risks were taken from the international literature and risk factor prevalences (mainly for the age range 20-59 years) were derived from the 1987-1991 Dutch Monitoring Project on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Some important assumptions and difficulties in calculating and interpreting the PAR's and PAR like measures are summarized in chapter 2. Chapter 3 contains a description of PAR calculations for a series of determinants, later summarized (chapter 4) from the viewpoints of both diseases and determinants. PAR's for individual determinants ranged from 10 to 90 percent. From a Public Health point of view, intervention in a determinant which has a moderately strong influence one or more frequently occurring diseases, will lead to more gain in health than intervention in a determinant which has a strong influence on a rare disease. From the results it is clear, that cigarette smoking is the determinant causing the greatest health loss: the prevalence of cigarette smoking is still high (about 40 percent in men and women aged 20-59 years) in the Netherlands. Cigarette smoking influences mortality from a number of indicators (cancer of the lung, larynx, oral cavity and oesophagus, coronary heart disease, stroke and chronic respiratory disorders). Coronary heart disease has the largest number of determinants for which it was possible to calculate PARs. The general conclusion is that for the health problems mentioned in the Netherlands a substantial health gain is at least theoretically possible. As a large part of these risk factors are made up of life style factors there are important individual and collective choices involved in trying to further improve the health status of the Netherlands. The PARs calculated here for the individual determinants are a simplification of reality, because interactions between determinants have not been taken into consideration. Mathematical models are now being constructed which take these interactions into account. In addition, more attention will have to be paid to the health gains that may be achieved in old age.

Country
Netherlands
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research