
handle: 10017/66763
En este estudio se analizan las desviaciones entre el EBITDA publicado y el EBITDA calculado en base a la recomendación recogida en la OE 4/2016 de AECA detectadas en una muestra de entidades compuesta por el total de las entidades no financieras pertenecientes al IBEX-35 durante el periodo 2012?2016. Como demuestra este estudio, un 60,7% de las entidades analizadas publican un EBITDA superior al EBITDA normalizado. La razón de la existencia de esta práctica generalizada se concreta en la ausencia de normativa respecto a esta variable alternativa de rendimiento no estandarizada que permite a los administradores de las compañías gestionarla, incluyendo o excluyendo ajustes de manera discrecional.
EBITDA, OE 4/2016 AECA, Estado de resultados, Alternative Performance Measurement (APM), Empresa, Management science
EBITDA, OE 4/2016 AECA, Estado de resultados, Alternative Performance Measurement (APM), Empresa, Management science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
